Tweets for 2010-08-23
- "When I wrote this, only God and I understood what I was doing. Now, God only knows." A code comment. http://goo.gl/EXD9 via @Missing_Faktor #
- RT @andreisavu: 10 Common Mistakes Made by API Providers http://bit.ly/9oWkoh #
- From a blog post: The most platform independent technology you can use is either Flash or Silverlight. <- me : Silverlight ??? #
- @IamSB I was just quoting someone else
in reply to IamSB # - New codeblog post: Clojure style multi methods in python http://is.gd/eylkx #
- @codemonkeyism was that in the context of my codeblog post ? in reply to codemonkeyism #
- @codemonkeyism If y, its trivially easy in python. Lambdas can represent conditions (probably half an hr more work) in reply to codemonkeyism #
- Updated codeblog post: Clojure style multi methods in python http://is.gd/eylkx Now no switch func, but conditions per function. #
- @codemonkeyism Ahh, Wasn't aware of the non clojure posts. But your tweet inspired me to extend my post to include a non switched version in reply to codemonkeyism #
- Very begrudgingly with a lot of study coming around to the thought that jQuery could be termed a monad @Missing_Faktor @vdichev @kaleidic #
- @kaleidic Certainly. If for no other reason than that it was a little too intense journey for a OO guy. in reply to kaleidic #
- @fogus I just saw ur comment n approved it. Had received a similar comment on a mailing list earlier. (though it took about 5-7 mins 2 impl) in reply to fogus #
- @fogus Yes. Let me take a look at it. While prima facie feasible to impl it, I suspect its very unidiomatic for python which has no symbols. in reply to fogus #
- @fogus ie. allowing "data" to derive from each other seems extremely uncharacteristic for python. in reply to fogus #
- @fogus Completely agreed. Most langs cannot compete with the minimalistic elegance of lisp PS: Responded to your comment with sample code in reply to fogus #